ivar27
11-08 12:28 PM
Thanks for quick response.
I still do not know wat is query is. My employer hasnt received the details of query yet.
looking at the worst side, wat if the H1 tranfer Denied/rejected. Can i ask Company D to file for a new H1?
I still do not know wat is query is. My employer hasnt received the details of query yet.
looking at the worst side, wat if the H1 tranfer Denied/rejected. Can i ask Company D to file for a new H1?
wallpaper Kitten and Puppy Sleeping
greenlight
08-27 08:54 PM
Here is the thread for people who filed AOS between July 17 and Aug. 17. You might find people in your situation.
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=12765
I just got my receipt notice today.
Get involved with collective movement and the DC rally on Sept. 18. I can't attend, but am contributing $ toward someone else attending the rally.
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=12765
I just got my receipt notice today.
Get involved with collective movement and the DC rally on Sept. 18. I can't attend, but am contributing $ toward someone else attending the rally.
techskill
08-14 03:26 PM
Hi All,
I am thinking of doing PERM filing on my own under EB2 category.I need suggestions from optimistic members about this possibility.Also,please if you can provide links(website) which can help me through this stupid & cumbersome process.
PEACE
Also your company should put up ads for the labor about the vacancy. You cannot put ads for yourseld.
I am thinking of doing PERM filing on my own under EB2 category.I need suggestions from optimistic members about this possibility.Also,please if you can provide links(website) which can help me through this stupid & cumbersome process.
PEACE
Also your company should put up ads for the labor about the vacancy. You cannot put ads for yourseld.
2011 having so much fun together
aarzoo
01-14 01:19 PM
Yes without original PERM approval, USCIS does not accept cases for PP
more...
gcseeker2002
01-07 10:28 AM
Like many others we have been waiting for our AOS application to be approved for over 2 years. But the strange thing is, I did get an EAD approved but they never called me in for fingerprinting and Biometrics. I know I had to do the non-immigration "registration" that was initiated a few years ago and they had taken my fingerprints and biometrics, is that why they didn't call me in again? since they already have it?
Good to know this !
Good to know this !
Dhundhun
11-17 11:26 PM
My wife has very smooth and sweaty hands. When i applied for Canadian immigration during FBI FP process even after n no. of attempts we couldnt get good prints on FP Sheet using INK.
It is electronic imaging, with very advnced technology. It immediately analyzes, whether it is legible or not, so that if illegible, repeated operations can be performed. I hope that she will not have any problem.
:)
It is electronic imaging, with very advnced technology. It immediately analyzes, whether it is legible or not, so that if illegible, repeated operations can be performed. I hope that she will not have any problem.
:)
more...
morchu
05-27 12:44 PM
Wrong info.
Denial of "extension of stay" wont invalidate "visa stamping".
also if you get denial stamp no longer be valid. This is what I also read online.
Denial of "extension of stay" wont invalidate "visa stamping".
also if you get denial stamp no longer be valid. This is what I also read online.
2010 Puppies And Kittens Sleeping
royus77
04-23 06:21 PM
I was laid off by my employer( Big staffing company) and i am in the 2 weeks notice period . I am looking for any company( desi one - reasonable) who can sponsor my H1B and also start the GC process immediately .They should be able to work with most of the vendor ( corp-corp)
I am in my end of 6 th year and my employer is willing to give the approved 1 140 ( Eb2- Feb 2006 PD ) .
what are my best options right now .I am looking for some advise about good company with decent track record ?
I had pretty bad experience earlier with a chicago based desi company and then moved this big staffing firm . I am not looking for great marketing as i can manage myself.
Thanks
Royus
I am in my end of 6 th year and my employer is willing to give the approved 1 140 ( Eb2- Feb 2006 PD ) .
what are my best options right now .I am looking for some advise about good company with decent track record ?
I had pretty bad experience earlier with a chicago based desi company and then moved this big staffing firm . I am not looking for great marketing as i can manage myself.
Thanks
Royus
more...
Sakthisagar
12-01 03:57 PM
Thank You dealsnet. I updated myself too.
hair cute kitten and bird sleeping
cox
April 3rd, 2005, 09:09 AM
I like the contrast of #2 better, but the sharp lines and reflections in #1 make it better for me overall.
more...
useriim
07-04 09:40 AM
Hello,
I'm outside US with AP (expiring in about a month). My GC has been approved this June.
My GC employer has run out of work. He is likely to get work later.
My options are:
a) Stay outside US and look for project. On getting confirmed work, enter US to join employer.
b) Enter US, look for project. On getting confirmed work, join employer.
Getting employed by GC sponsor employer with, either option could take few months.
While entering US, I will NOT have EVL(employment letter), only AP & I485 Approval Notice.
Which is safer option (a or b) for US entry ?
What questions can be asked at POE ? What should I say if asked about employer ?
Can GC be revoked at POE?
Which is safer option (a or b) for GC renewal, citizenship ?
Thanks.
I'm outside US with AP (expiring in about a month). My GC has been approved this June.
My GC employer has run out of work. He is likely to get work later.
My options are:
a) Stay outside US and look for project. On getting confirmed work, enter US to join employer.
b) Enter US, look for project. On getting confirmed work, join employer.
Getting employed by GC sponsor employer with, either option could take few months.
While entering US, I will NOT have EVL(employment letter), only AP & I485 Approval Notice.
Which is safer option (a or b) for US entry ?
What questions can be asked at POE ? What should I say if asked about employer ?
Can GC be revoked at POE?
Which is safer option (a or b) for GC renewal, citizenship ?
Thanks.
hot kittens sleeping together.
siva008
08-15 12:28 PM
I am currently working with Comapany A with valid I-94 till 09/30/2011(but no visa stamping in passport yet).
Recently My H1B visa tranfer approved with out 1-94 card attached to approval copy(still I am with Company A only)
In this case can I continue with CompanyA.
please help me if any one knows about this case.
Thanks in advance.
Recently My H1B visa tranfer approved with out 1-94 card attached to approval copy(still I am with Company A only)
In this case can I continue with CompanyA.
please help me if any one knows about this case.
Thanks in advance.
more...
house puppies and kittens sleeping
cheers1234
06-15 08:22 AM
Sorry for the confusion. i am not deported. One of my company's new employee was deported at POE. Yes. POE did called my employer and asked where he is going to work. My employer said he is going to work on our company site. Then the officer said your empoyee told us that he is going to work at client site. Then the officer said he will call back.
Officer called back after 30min and told my employer that your emplyee submitted some fraud document. And then my employer said i am not liable what he did and explined the officer that he was doing bussinees more than 8 years and have all the proper documents.
Then the officer said he understand the situation and said he is just doing duty. Officer said he is going to send a report to DOL.
Officer called back after 30min and told my employer that your emplyee submitted some fraud document. And then my employer said i am not liable what he did and explined the officer that he was doing bussinees more than 8 years and have all the proper documents.
Then the officer said he understand the situation and said he is just doing duty. Officer said he is going to send a report to DOL.
tattoo Smoke Exotic Kitten Curled up
Blog Feeds
03-08 07:40 AM
AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgQp2L8tdcJLIhTKMHg2Xm6K_QLmBohzIVqlIjlEWNVuYoL2TcDTHwz08IQNUXg21MVqTLqx_G018od5oF16rhEwULY4UMVSvuwzogRa3mVFxUSUH5wYD-p3GG-0ExA8TiAtwaR0cOQoYs/s320/2010-03-07+alg_cuomo1.jpg (https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgQp2L8tdcJLIhTKMHg2Xm6K_QLmBohzIVqlIjlEWNVuYoL2TcDTHwz08IQNUXg21MVqTLqx_G018od5oF16rhEwULY4UMVSvuwzogRa3mVFxUSUH5wYD-p3GG-0ExA8TiAtwaR0cOQoYs/s1600-h/2010-03-07+alg_cuomo1.jpg)
By Deborah Notkin, AILA Past President
Attorney General Andrew Cuomo has successfully carried out a crusade against the fraud and deception of "immigration consultants" who take advantage of unknowing and vulnerable immigrants. At a recent media conference, Cuomo indicated that his office is seeking civil remedies, at least initially against those involved in immigration assistance fraud because the first goal is to get restitution for victims. http://www.ag.ny.gov/media_center/2010/mar/mar1a_10.html
The latest victory in the fight against immigration fraud and victimization was announced by Cuomo's office on March 1, 2010. The Attorney Generals' Office has won a court judgment of more than $3 million against a "consultant" in Queens who has targeted and defrauded immigrants. In this case, the "consultant" routinely charged a retainer of $7,000 with fees often reaching up to $15,000 per person for the promise of permanent residence. The consultant wrongly claimed that she could get permanent resident status through alleged relationships with government officials. Of course, the services were never performed and the consultant routinely refused to give refunds or return documents.
As a result of Cuomo's lawsuit, the New York Supreme Court has ordered the consultant to pay full restitution to 37 families who came forward and demonstrated that they were defrauded by this consultant. An additional $2.7 million in penalties was imposed for engaging in the unauthorized practice of law and misrepresentation of services that could be performed. The consultant is also permanently restricted directly and indirectly from engaging in the business of immigration-related services.
Over the past several months, other consultants have been shut down and active investigations continue. The fight to end this blight on immigrant communities in New York City and State continues and serves as an example for all who are committed to fighting immigration fraud and the unauthorized practice of law.
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-5282899656706770162?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2010/03/new-york-attorney-general-cuomo-gets.html)
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgQp2L8tdcJLIhTKMHg2Xm6K_QLmBohzIVqlIjlEWNVuYoL2TcDTHwz08IQNUXg21MVqTLqx_G018od5oF16rhEwULY4UMVSvuwzogRa3mVFxUSUH5wYD-p3GG-0ExA8TiAtwaR0cOQoYs/s320/2010-03-07+alg_cuomo1.jpg (https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgQp2L8tdcJLIhTKMHg2Xm6K_QLmBohzIVqlIjlEWNVuYoL2TcDTHwz08IQNUXg21MVqTLqx_G018od5oF16rhEwULY4UMVSvuwzogRa3mVFxUSUH5wYD-p3GG-0ExA8TiAtwaR0cOQoYs/s1600-h/2010-03-07+alg_cuomo1.jpg)
By Deborah Notkin, AILA Past President
Attorney General Andrew Cuomo has successfully carried out a crusade against the fraud and deception of "immigration consultants" who take advantage of unknowing and vulnerable immigrants. At a recent media conference, Cuomo indicated that his office is seeking civil remedies, at least initially against those involved in immigration assistance fraud because the first goal is to get restitution for victims. http://www.ag.ny.gov/media_center/2010/mar/mar1a_10.html
The latest victory in the fight against immigration fraud and victimization was announced by Cuomo's office on March 1, 2010. The Attorney Generals' Office has won a court judgment of more than $3 million against a "consultant" in Queens who has targeted and defrauded immigrants. In this case, the "consultant" routinely charged a retainer of $7,000 with fees often reaching up to $15,000 per person for the promise of permanent residence. The consultant wrongly claimed that she could get permanent resident status through alleged relationships with government officials. Of course, the services were never performed and the consultant routinely refused to give refunds or return documents.
As a result of Cuomo's lawsuit, the New York Supreme Court has ordered the consultant to pay full restitution to 37 families who came forward and demonstrated that they were defrauded by this consultant. An additional $2.7 million in penalties was imposed for engaging in the unauthorized practice of law and misrepresentation of services that could be performed. The consultant is also permanently restricted directly and indirectly from engaging in the business of immigration-related services.
Over the past several months, other consultants have been shut down and active investigations continue. The fight to end this blight on immigrant communities in New York City and State continues and serves as an example for all who are committed to fighting immigration fraud and the unauthorized practice of law.
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-5282899656706770162?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2010/03/new-york-attorney-general-cuomo-gets.html)
more...
pictures a small kitten or a puppy
number30
03-12 11:09 AM
Gurus,
My lawyer received Ability to Pay rfe on my I-140. My lawyer is ready with most of the documents
Duration to be covered
2004-2008
My docs ready for the duration:
W2s ( 2004 - 2008)
Tax returns ( 2004 - 2007)
Paystubs ( recent )
Company docs ready:
Tax returns: 2004 - 2007
However for year 2008, company has requested IRS an extension to file tax return.Company is trying to come up with audited financial statement for year 2008. They are still working on it.
However deadline for filing RFE response is this Wednesday ( 03/11/2009)
My questions:
1. Can my lawyer ask for an extension for filing RFE response in this scenario ?
2. Are there any alternatives if my company cannot come up with audited financial statements in this time frame ?
I appreciate your inputs.
You can send the certfied statements along with bank statements along with explaination. But they will not consider that. But you have send for the heck of sending them
My lawyer received Ability to Pay rfe on my I-140. My lawyer is ready with most of the documents
Duration to be covered
2004-2008
My docs ready for the duration:
W2s ( 2004 - 2008)
Tax returns ( 2004 - 2007)
Paystubs ( recent )
Company docs ready:
Tax returns: 2004 - 2007
However for year 2008, company has requested IRS an extension to file tax return.Company is trying to come up with audited financial statement for year 2008. They are still working on it.
However deadline for filing RFE response is this Wednesday ( 03/11/2009)
My questions:
1. Can my lawyer ask for an extension for filing RFE response in this scenario ?
2. Are there any alternatives if my company cannot come up with audited financial statements in this time frame ?
I appreciate your inputs.
You can send the certfied statements along with bank statements along with explaination. But they will not consider that. But you have send for the heck of sending them
dresses +puppies+sleeping+together
cest la vie
01-28 04:24 AM
Hi...I went to the USA in Dec 05, with a J1 visa, in may 06 after i applyed for changing of status to B2 visa, I got it denied and the letter said I should leave usa. I didnt, staying there until aug 07 (more than 1 year). my visa expired in apil 06 and the letter from uscis i got in may 06. they wrote in my I-94 cos denied 04-18-06. I didnt give back my I-94 when i left the USA. I want to know what are my chances to get a L2 visa (my husband is applying for L1 visa). I also have a second nationallity, can it help me somehow?
Please, I really need someone to help me with thses doubts.thank you very much.
Please, I really need someone to help me with thses doubts.thank you very much.
more...
makeup puppies and kittens sleeping
PALLO
04-15 02:15 PM
Hello,
My Labor was denied for the following reason -
Neither the earliest date listed for a recruitment step on ETA Form 9089, 03/20/2008 listed in XXX and XXX, nor the date the application was filed 8/27/2008 fall within the Prevailing wage determination validity period of 4/21/200-7/20/2008. This indicates the employer did not begin recruitement, not file the application during the Prevailing wage determination period.
Can you guys please suggest what could be done. Letter states we can ask for a review. But lawyer thinks we have start the process from the begining.
Would appreciate susgestion ASAP. Have only 15 days to respond.
Thanks
My Labor was denied for the following reason -
Neither the earliest date listed for a recruitment step on ETA Form 9089, 03/20/2008 listed in XXX and XXX, nor the date the application was filed 8/27/2008 fall within the Prevailing wage determination validity period of 4/21/200-7/20/2008. This indicates the employer did not begin recruitement, not file the application during the Prevailing wage determination period.
Can you guys please suggest what could be done. Letter states we can ask for a review. But lawyer thinks we have start the process from the begining.
Would appreciate susgestion ASAP. Have only 15 days to respond.
Thanks
girlfriend puppy_kitten
virtual55
04-07 09:04 AM
NumbersUSA obtained a summary of the "compromise" negotiated among Republicans Tuesday night. The language is theirs, not ours. We do not know how discussions between Republicans and Democrats have changed the plan, or if it is still a factor in the debate.
Hagel/Martinez Amendment
Background:
The Hagel/Martinez Substitute contains all the provisions of the Specter Amendment - including the border security, interior security and employer enforcement provisions from the Frist bill - but makes the following 3 changes:
1. It proposes an alternative to Title VI, Subtitle A of the Specter substitute (which deals with the illegal population living in the U.S.)
2. It temporarily increases the number of employment based green cards from 290,000 (as in the Specter Substitute) to 450,000. This increase from 290,000 to 450,000 would sunset after ten years.
3. It would give mid-term illegal immigrants (defined below) priority in applying for green cards over future immigrants entering as temporary workers.
The Hagel/Martinez Amendment is based on legislation (S.1919) introduced by Senator Hagel in October 2005.
Hagel/Martinez Amendment
Background:
The Hagel/Martinez Substitute contains all the provisions of the Specter Amendment - including the border security, interior security and employer enforcement provisions from the Frist bill - but makes the following 3 changes:
1. It proposes an alternative to Title VI, Subtitle A of the Specter substitute (which deals with the illegal population living in the U.S.)
2. It temporarily increases the number of employment based green cards from 290,000 (as in the Specter Substitute) to 450,000. This increase from 290,000 to 450,000 would sunset after ten years.
3. It would give mid-term illegal immigrants (defined below) priority in applying for green cards over future immigrants entering as temporary workers.
The Hagel/Martinez Amendment is based on legislation (S.1919) introduced by Senator Hagel in October 2005.
hairstyles hot Sleeping Puppies - Keith
kirupa
04-18 03:05 PM
Hello,
I do not think Swift 3D has a wireframe export features, but you can press the Print Screen button and paste the image into an image editor. You will be able to manipulate it like you would any other image. That is the best way that I know of doing it. You could also import the Swift 3D swf into Flash, and let Flash export the movie as a sequence of images.
I do not think Swift 3D has a wireframe export features, but you can press the Print Screen button and paste the image into an image editor. You will be able to manipulate it like you would any other image. That is the best way that I know of doing it. You could also import the Swift 3D swf into Flash, and let Flash export the movie as a sequence of images.
Queen Josephine
March 23rd, 2007, 02:15 PM
Hey,
I'm hoping you guys can help me choose a lens. My boss said I could order the new Nikon D40X, and the package options I see are as follows:
body with 18-55 lens & 55 -200 lens OR
body with 18-135 lens.
Which would be better, why, or what factors should I consider in choosing.
Thanks. I have CC in hand, but don't want to order til I here back from my dphoto friends.
QJ
I'm hoping you guys can help me choose a lens. My boss said I could order the new Nikon D40X, and the package options I see are as follows:
body with 18-55 lens & 55 -200 lens OR
body with 18-135 lens.
Which would be better, why, or what factors should I consider in choosing.
Thanks. I have CC in hand, but don't want to order til I here back from my dphoto friends.
QJ
pappu
12-09 12:15 AM
wow, u actually digged out the real feb95 bulletin.. amazing how many 'C's it had.. those were the days
You did not have H1B extensions and AC21 though!
You did not have H1B extensions and AC21 though!